by Christopher Barr
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f479/6f4798df183bd0b69390f202bf42ce59b0213076" alt=""
“The purpose of art is to impart the sensation of things as they are perceived and not as they are known. The technique of art is to make objects ‘unfamiliar’, to make forms difficult to increase the difficulty and length of perception because the process of perception is an aesthetic end in itself and must be prolonged.” - Russian Writer, Viktor Shklovsky
Defamiliarization, coined by Shklovsky, is when you take a familiar way of looking at something and make it strange or obscure in order to alter your perception of that thing, allowing you to experience that thing in a new way or a new angle. This helps force the individual to alter their state of formula in spite of themselves.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90a6d/90a6dfbe3b422ce8939d8cd768b8cee7edd4ca75" alt=""
Freud called the interpretation of dreams the royal road to knowledge of the unconscious, that vast area in the mind, while a wake one doesn’t have direct conscious access to. He saw content in dreams as a chaotic vivid jumble of thoughts, ideas, wishes, feelings, distorted memories and fears. By exploring these dreams with a trained mind one might get glimpses into that elusive and forbidden area of the mind.
You must see a film twice to see it for the first time….
Mulholland Drive (2001) is an abstract, surreal piece of masterful cinema. It’s considered one of the most thought provoking films ever made where pimple faced high schooler’s to Rhodes scholar’s painfully deconstruct the film’s narrative. The director David Lynch has been often asked in interviews what the film actually means. Like many artists before him, he says it’s left up to the viewer to decipher, not the artist’s own interpretation of the piece. The viewer needs to allow the art to wash over their consciousness so it can seep into their sub-conscious and hopefully resonate. Language can often ruin the essence of abstraction, when one autopsy’s a particular piece of an art form.
This is why defamiliarization is so important in art because of the problem of desensitization with familiarity. If an artist is able to keep pushing his art away from meaningful symbolization then the viewers of the art will always keep wondering. And that’s the key, to keep the flow of wonder alive within us and not to allow complacency to soften our sensory perception of the world outside our minds.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/026a4/026a4d90bf99b813b33f3c3377540ca2bbc5dd72" alt=""
Using the Freudian iceberg approach, I’ll begin with a look at the surface content of the film, above the water as it were and discuss the protagonist’s ‘pair of ragged claws scuttling across the floors of silent seas.’ I use T.S Eliot’s Prufrock line because of the “ungeheures ungeziefer”, the seething and malicious, bottom feeding nature of the depressed, lonely protagonist, who’s found herself lost in a symbolic dark forest in her neurotic mind without being able to find her way out.
The ambitious film is about obsession, jealousy, envy, suicide and murder. But like all of Lynch’s films, that’s the surface elements to a much deeper psychological meaning. The real genius of the film is the multi layered aspects of its challenging structure. But if this maze of a film has a nucleus it’s Diane Selwyn, a druggy, actress wannabe that never made it and her envious obsession over Camilla Rhodes, an actress that did make it. After a complete breakdown of all of Diane’s hopes and dreams, culminating at a dinner party where Camilla becomes engaged, she hires a hitman to kill Camilla. When the job is done Diane in her apartment has a complete psychotic breakdown and shoots herself in the head thus ending her misery. Fade to Black, story over.
The film is also a critique on the Hollywood myth, a place where people go for fame and fortune…
There have been many films over the years that have explored in depth, psychological narratives. Lynch’s own Blue Velvet (1986) is up there as one of the best and most daring. Alfred Hitchcock’s Rear Window (1954), also one of my favorites, on the surface was about a man housebound as a result of a broken leg, bored and spying on the people in the building across a courtyard with a big set of binoculars. But underneath the surface of the story, was it not about a man terrified of committing to a beautiful woman who wanted nothing more then to spend the rest of her life with him? Weren’t all those people in the various apartments he was eavesdropping on potential versions of a future if he does commit? A dinner party with family and friends, not so bad, but what about the lonely woman on the bottom floor waiting by the phone for that call from a man that may no longer love her? But worse, is the man that kills his wife and disposes of her body. We parade our minds with so many possible outcomes that we chain ourselves from living in the present and letting the chips fall where they may, with all their ups and downs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/943f9/943f9c5aaf62e9df050e9062481702120c1b4137" alt=""
Adam Kesher’s the director of the film within the film, within a dream. The poor guy is run through the ringer. Crazy mob guys order him to cast the lead actress in his film without his consent. This obviously irritates him deeply and he storms out only to go home and find his wife in bed with another man. He then finds out that the production has been shut down on his film and mob guys are after him. A mysterious cowboy in the desert hills of southern California threatens him with his life, in a very nice and pleasant way, to choose the girl they want in the production. This is all Diane’s hatred toward the man in her mind stole her girlfriend from her, he is also the man who didn’t cast her in the starring role of his film. Kesher in Diane’s reality is on top of his game purposing to Camilla.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51608/51608a5bc63d24dc699347372cf426bf9a449c87" alt=""
It’s time to wake up…..
At the director’s dinner party close to the end of the film, a humiliated Diane meets the director’s mother, who sees her with pity and contempt becomes her landlady in her dream, the jovial and wholehearted Coco. The fat man across the room becomes the espresso hating gangster in her cinematic fantasy dream. The cowboy at the party in the background she notices becomes the cowboy that threatens Kesher in the dark hills. Camilla becomes Betty’s dependent, a loving person with a desperate need to know the truth. A person Betty carries throughout their investigation.
In Diane’s dream the hitman become the pimp. But the reality is he’s the killer, he’s the one that kills the love of her life as requested and paid for by her. The conversation at the beginning of the film between two men in Twinkie’s, the same diner Diane make’s her Faustian deal, is an acknowledgement of the reality of her hiring a hitman to kill a person, told in the dream within the dream about a monster at the back of the diner. A homeless man, seen later holding the blue box, where the repressed reality of the murder resides.
The beginning of the film shows the jitterbug competition that Diane won many years ago and then her head hitting her present day pillow. Learning that she got the blue key from the hitman, hence validating the assassination.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c718/5c71844c6524367eea2db94ecdfe6abb345d228a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd36d/cd36d40ae60cec8d9549002687ad000e00d65a64" alt=""
Silencio….
Outstanding article, Chris! I think this is your best one yet! It showed great insight and thorough understanding of that David Lynch classic and its deep psychological underpinnings. :-)
ReplyDelete